Lector's Notes | To the home page![]() of Lector's Notes | |
Second Sunday of Lent, Year B, March 12, 2006 |
The Historical Situation: For brevity, the editors of the Lectionary have left out of this selection several verses. You'll do well to read the whole chapter, Genesis 22, to yourself. This story is all the more poignant because Abraham and Sarah had been childless so long and so unhappily until the birth of Isaac.
The Theological Background: In itself, the story of Abraham's willingness to sacrifice Isaac carries great significance. Various scholars have pointed out these themes in it:
The Historical Situation: The context of this passage within the letter to the Romans is quite complex and difficult to describe. I hope it is not irreverent to say that Saint Paul has worked up a great sweat by a complex theological and historical argument about how we are really saved. Now he's very relieved to have finished that, and to have proven that God graciously saves us in Christ, and we need only have that faith.
So this passage is a kind of cheer for the victory that God has wrought by saving us. It's also meant to give heart to people worried about being unworthy of God's love.
One Literary Consideration: What of the metaphors of someone being "against us," bringing a charge, condemning or acquiting? The unspoken context is the image of a court of law, where God is judge and a prosecutorial angel would have God find us guilty (which is what Satan tried in the book of Job). But this case is already decided in our favor, as evidenced by these factors: God gave us his Son, so it's unthinkable that God would not also give us everything else; and no matter who prosecutes, their authority is outweighed by God who acquits us and by Jesus, raised up and interceding for us. Case closed.
Proclaiming the Passage: The revised New American Bible translation, the one most commonly used in U.S. Catholic congregations, while a little better than its predecessor, still fails to make clear that Paul is asking and answering rhetorical questions here. Think of it this way:
| Several other commentaries on these passages. All are thoughtful, all quite readable, from the scholarly to the popular.
Links may be incomplete more than a few weeks before the "due date." | |||||
| Dan Nelson's page covering Mark 9:2-9 (plus two readings not in the Lectionary today) Dianne Bergant's column on the first reading, from America magazine, 2003. | Columns about these readings from Father Roger Karban: from 2003 earlier, perhaps from 2000. This one contains a great homily starter. another, perhaps written in 1997 | ||||
| The Text This Week; links to homilies, art works, movies and other resources on the week's scripture themes | Saint Louis University's excellent Sunday liturgy site. | ||||
The Lectionary selections in the frame at the left, if any, are there for your convenience. The publishers of the page in that frame have no connection, except for membership in the one Body of Christ, with the publisher of this page. Likewise the publishers of the pages on the links above.
Send email to editor Greg Warnusz of Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Join a discussion among lectors.
Last modified: Sat Feb 25 11:31:43 CST 2006